EMO vs VTI
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc. vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.37% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.36% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 20 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +24.62% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.01% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.20% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +30.37% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 41.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -97.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
EMO vs VTI Performance
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc. (EMO) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMO returned +22.01% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, EMO is up 24.62% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, EMO compounded at +30.20% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +30.37% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -1.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.2% for EMO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMO charges 3.37% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $337 vs $3 annually, a gap of $334 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMO currently yields 7.36% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EMO and VTI share 6 holdings out of 2801 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMO or VTI?
EMO has an expense ratio of 3.37% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $334 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMO or VTI?
Over the past year EMO returned +22.01% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EMO annualized -1.25% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMO or VTI?
EMO has been the more volatile fund at 41.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMO -97.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EMO and VTI?
EMO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMO and VTI?
EMO and VTI share 6 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2801 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMO or VTI?
EMO yields 7.36% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.