EMO vs VTI
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc. vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EMO or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMO led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.36% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 20 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +27.61%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +24.26%Best | +20.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.64%Best | +20.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +30.09%Best | +11.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 41.7% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -97.2% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $37,258Best | $17,474 |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 10, 2011 to Sep 4, 2026 (15.2 years).
EMO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.2 years both funds cover.
EMO vs VTI Performance
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund Inc. (EMO) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMO returned +24.26% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, EMO is up 27.61% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, EMO compounded at +29.64% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +30.09% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.75% annualized vs -1.09%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.7% compared with 14.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.2% for EMO and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMO charges 3.37% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $337 vs $3 annually, a gap of $334 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMO currently yields 7.36% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 39.4% of EMO's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
6 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in EMO and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 20 and 3,543.
39.4% of EMO is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMO or VTI?
EMO has an expense ratio of 3.37% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $334 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMO or VTI?
Over the past year EMO returned +24.26% vs +20.00% for VTI, so EMO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EMO annualized -1.09% vs +12.75% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMO or VTI?
EMO has been the more volatile fund at 41.7% annualized versus 14.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMO -97.2% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both EMO and VTI?
EMO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EMO and VTI?
At least 39.4% of EMO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in EMO and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMO or VTI?
EMO yields 7.36% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EMO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMO led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.