EMOP vs SCHD
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. EMOP delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMOP | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $2.0B | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +19.46% | +25.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.76% | +32.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.70% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
EMOP vs SCHD Performance
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EMOP returned +39.76% while SCHD returned +32.31%. Year to date, EMOP is up 19.46% versus a gain of 25.33% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMOP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for EMOP and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMOP charges 0.70% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $6 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMOP currently yields 0.00% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
EMOP and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 159 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMOP or SCHD?
EMOP has an expense ratio of 0.70% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMOP or SCHD?
Over the past year EMOP returned +39.76% vs +32.31% for SCHD, so EMOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), EMOP annualized +40.36% vs +11.45% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMOP or SCHD?
EMOP has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: EMOP -13.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both EMOP and SCHD?
EMOP and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMOP and SCHD?
EMOP and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 159 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMOP or SCHD?
EMOP yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.