EMOP vs VXUS
EMOP vs VXUS
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EMOP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMOP | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2.0B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +20.38% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.20% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EMOP vs VXUS Performance
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMOP returned +40.20% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, EMOP is up 20.38% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMOP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for EMOP and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMOP charges 0.70% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $5 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMOP currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EMOP and VXUS share 39 holdings out of 7881 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMOP | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2308:TW | 3.41% | 0.20% | 3.21% |
| PBR | 2.92% | 0.08% | 2.84% |
| 3968:HK | 2.94% | 0.05% | 2.89% |
| PKN:PL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| FEMSAUBD:MX | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GFNORTEO:MX | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| ITUB:BV | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| 000270:KR | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| RDY:MB | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| LTM:CL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings EMOP shares with VXUS Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMOP or VXUS?
EMOP has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMOP or VXUS?
Over the past year EMOP returned +40.20% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so EMOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), EMOP annualized +41.66% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMOP or VXUS?
EMOP has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EMOP -13.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EMOP and VXUS?
EMOP and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between EMOP and VXUS?
EMOP and VXUS share 39 common holdings with a 2.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7881 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMOP or VXUS?
EMOP yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.