EMOP vs IVV
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EMOP delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMOP | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.0B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +22.69% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +41.53% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
EMOP vs IVV Performance
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMOP returned +41.53% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, EMOP is up 22.69% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMOP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for EMOP and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMOP charges 0.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMOP currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EMOP and IVV share 1 holdings out of 563 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMOP | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CL | 2.16% | 0.11% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMOP or IVV?
EMOP has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMOP or IVV?
Over the past year EMOP returned +41.53% vs +21.64% for IVV, so EMOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), EMOP annualized +43.42% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMOP or IVV?
EMOP has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EMOP -13.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EMOP and IVV?
EMOP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMOP and IVV?
EMOP and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 563 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMOP or IVV?
EMOP yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.