EMOP vs VOO
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EMOP or VOO?
EMOP has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EMOP led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMOP | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.15% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 73 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +23.95%Best | +12.25% |
| 1Y Return | +34.69%Best | +17.03% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $15,044Best | $12,825 |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.2% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 18, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.2 years).
EMOP vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
EMOP vs VOO Performance
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMOP returned +34.69% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, EMOP is up 23.95% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMOP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 12.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for EMOP and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMOP charges 0.70% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMOP currently yields 2.15% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
2.1% of EMOP's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings EMOP also owns.
EMOP and VOO share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 57 positions we hold weights for in EMOP and 494 in VOO, against full books of 73 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 486 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for EMOP (99.0% of the fund), and 4 for EMOP that do not appear in VOO (7.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMOP | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 2.15% | 0.11% | 2.04% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMOP and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMOP or VOO?
EMOP has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMOP or VOO?
Over the past year EMOP returned +34.69% vs +17.03% for VOO, so EMOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), EMOP annualized +40.54% vs +23.04% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMOP or VOO?
EMOP has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 12.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EMOP -13.1% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both EMOP and VOO?
EMOP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EMOP and VOO?
2.1% of EMOP's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's is in holdings EMOP also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 57 positions we hold weights for in EMOP and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMOP or VOO?
EMOP yields 2.15% while VOO yields 1.04%, so EMOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than EMOP?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EMOP led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.