EMOP vs VOO
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EMOP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMOP | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.0B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +20.11% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.53% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EMOP vs VOO Performance
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMOP returned +40.53% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, EMOP is up 20.11% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMOP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for EMOP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMOP charges 0.70% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMOP currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EMOP and VOO share 1 holdings out of 563 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMOP | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CL | 2.16% | 0.11% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMOP or VOO?
EMOP has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMOP or VOO?
Over the past year EMOP returned +40.53% vs +22.62% for VOO, so EMOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), EMOP annualized +40.91% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMOP or VOO?
EMOP has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EMOP -13.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EMOP and VOO?
EMOP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMOP and VOO?
EMOP and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 563 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMOP or VOO?
EMOP yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.