EMOP vs VTI
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMOP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMOP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.0B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 83 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +23.94% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +41.62% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
EMOP vs VTI Performance
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMOP returned +41.62% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, EMOP is up 23.94% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMOP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for EMOP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMOP charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMOP currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EMOP and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2841 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMOP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CL | 2.16% | 0.10% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMOP or VTI?
EMOP has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMOP or VTI?
Over the past year EMOP returned +41.62% vs +22.39% for VTI, so EMOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), EMOP annualized +44.56% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMOP or VTI?
EMOP has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMOP -13.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EMOP and VTI?
EMOP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMOP and VTI?
EMOP and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2841 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMOP or VTI?
EMOP yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.