EMOP vs VTI
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EMOP or VTI?
EMOP has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMOP led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMOP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.15% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 73 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +23.95%Best | +11.06% |
| 1Y Return | +34.69%Best | +15.41% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.3% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $14,850Best | $12,694 |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 18, 2025 to Sep 16, 2026 (1.2 years).
EMOP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
EMOP vs VTI Performance
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMOP returned +34.69% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, EMOP is up 23.95% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMOP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 12.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for EMOP and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMOP charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMOP currently yields 2.15% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
2.1% of EMOP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings EMOP also owns.
EMOP and VTI share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 57 positions we hold weights for in EMOP and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 73 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,149 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EMOP (97.3% of the fund), and 4 for EMOP that do not appear in VTI (7.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMOP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 2.15% | 0.10% | 2.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMOP and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMOP or VTI?
EMOP has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMOP or VTI?
Over the past year EMOP returned +34.69% vs +15.41% for VTI, so EMOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), EMOP annualized +39.03% vs +21.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMOP or VTI?
EMOP has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 12.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMOP -13.1% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both EMOP and VTI?
EMOP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EMOP and VTI?
2.1% of EMOP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's is in holdings EMOP also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 57 positions we hold weights for in EMOP and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMOP or VTI?
EMOP yields 2.15% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EMOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EMOP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMOP led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.