EMTY vs VTI
ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMTY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.28% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.83% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.12% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.98% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.22% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 14, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
EMTY vs VTI Performance
ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMTY returned +5.12% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, EMTY is down 2.83% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, EMTY compounded at -4.98% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -3.22% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -11.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.1% for EMTY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.75. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMTY charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMTY currently yields 3.28% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMTY or VTI?
EMTY has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMTY or VTI?
Over the past year EMTY returned +5.12% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), EMTY annualized -11.64% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMTY or VTI?
EMTY has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMTY -78.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EMTY and VTI?
EMTY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMTY or VTI?
EMTY yields 3.28% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EMTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.