EMTY vs QQQ
ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMTY | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $3M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.33% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -2.11% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.91% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.91% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.98% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 14, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EMTY vs QQQ Performance
ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) is a ETF from ProShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EMTY returned +3.91% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, EMTY is down 2.11% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, EMTY compounded at -4.91% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -2.98% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs -11.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 24.1% for EMTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.1% for EMTY and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMTY charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMTY currently yields 3.33% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMTY or QQQ?
EMTY has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMTY or QQQ?
Over the past year EMTY returned +3.91% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), EMTY annualized -11.56% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMTY or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 24.1% for EMTY. Worst drawdown: EMTY -78.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EMTY and QQQ?
EMTY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMTY or QQQ?
EMTY yields 3.33% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EMTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.