EQRR vs VTI
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EQRR or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EQRR led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EQRR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $38M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 50 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +32.16%Best | +13.35% |
| 1Y Return | +37.67%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.73% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.00%Best | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.0% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,254Best | $18,286 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 25, 2017 to Oct 2, 2026 (9.2 years).
EQRR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.2 years both funds cover.
EQRR vs VTI Performance
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EQRR returned +37.67% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, EQRR is up 32.16% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, EQRR compounded at +22.73% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.00% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.54% annualized vs +9.83%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EQRR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.0% compared with 16.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for EQRR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EQRR charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EQRR currently yields 1.01% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.2% of EQRR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 20.0% of VTI's money is in holdings EQRR also owns.
Most of EQRR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EQRR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 50 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 3,463 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,100 positions EQRR does not, 77.4% of the fund.
Largest: AAPL 6.29%, MSFT 4.79%, AVGO 2.56%, GOOG 2.31%, META 1.70%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EQRR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.43% | 6.40% | 3.97% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.30% | 2.90% | 0.60% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.97% | 3.65% | 2.68% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 4.15% | 0.13% | 4.02% |
| VLOValero Energy | 3.93% | 0.13% | 3.80% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 3.30% | 0.52% | 2.78% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 3.43% | 0.20% | 3.23% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 3.29% | 0.06% | 3.23% |
| HPQHP Inc | 3.30% | 0.03% | 3.27% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.98% | 0.26% | 2.72% |
98.2% of EQRR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EQRR or VTI?
EQRR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EQRR or VTI?
Over the past year EQRR returned +37.67% vs +15.92% for VTI, so EQRR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), EQRR annualized +9.83% vs +13.54% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EQRR or VTI?
EQRR has been the more volatile fund at 25.0% annualized versus 16.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EQRR -59.5% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both EQRR and VTI?
EQRR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EQRR and VTI?
98.2% of EQRR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 20.0% of VTI's is in holdings EQRR also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EQRR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EQRR or VTI?
EQRR yields 1.01% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EQRR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EQRR led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.