EQRR vs VTI
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EQRR or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EQRR led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EQRR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 50 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +34.39%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +39.61%Best | +20.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.57% | +20.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.05%Best | +11.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.1% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,157Best | $17,474 |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 25, 2017 to Sep 4, 2026 (9.1 years).
EQRR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.1 years both funds cover.
EQRR vs VTI Performance
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EQRR returned +39.61% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, EQRR is up 34.39% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, EQRR compounded at +20.57% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.05% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.69% annualized vs +10.12%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EQRR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.1% compared with 16.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for EQRR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EQRR charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EQRR currently yields 1.07% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 95.4% of EQRR's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of EQRR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EQRR and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 50 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 2,788 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 637 positions EQRR does not, 72.4% of the fund.
Largest: AAPL 5.84%, MSFT 3.81%, AVGO 2.46%, GOOG 2.27%, MU 1.79%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EQRR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 2.57% | 6.32% | 3.75% |
| GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 2.42% | 2.88% | 0.46% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.06% | 3.17% | 2.11% |
| CVXChevron Corp.United States -Energy | 2.95% | 0.43% | 2.52% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp. | 3.17% | 0.10% | 3.07% |
| VLOValero Energy Corp | 3.16% | 0.11% | 3.05% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 2.94% | 0.17% | 2.77% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.97% | 1.11% | 0.86% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc - Common | 2.69% | 0.38% | 2.31% |
| BKRBaker Hughes Inc | 2.95% | 0.08% | 2.87% |
95.4% of EQRR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EQRR or VTI?
EQRR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EQRR or VTI?
Over the past year EQRR returned +39.61% vs +20.00% for VTI, so EQRR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), EQRR annualized +10.12% vs +13.69% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EQRR or VTI?
EQRR has been the more volatile fund at 25.1% annualized versus 16.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EQRR -59.5% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both EQRR and VTI?
EQRR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EQRR and VTI?
At least 95.4% of EQRR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EQRR and 2,788 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EQRR or VTI?
EQRR yields 1.07% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EQRR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EQRR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EQRR led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.