EQRR vs IVV
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EQRR or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EQRR led over 1Y and 5Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. EQRR is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EQRR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 50 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +34.39%Best | +13.39% |
| 1Y Return | +39.61%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.57% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.05%Best | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.1% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.5% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,157Best | $18,327 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.2%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 25, 2017 to Sep 4, 2026 (9.1 years).
EQRR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.1 years both funds cover.
EQRR vs IVV Performance
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) is an ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EQRR returned +39.61% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, EQRR is up 34.39% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, EQRR compounded at +20.57% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +15.05% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.21% annualized vs +10.12%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EQRR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.1% compared with 16.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.5% for EQRR and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EQRR charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EQRR currently yields 1.07% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
88.9% of EQRR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 23.3% of IVV's money is in holdings EQRR also owns.
Most of EQRR is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
46 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EQRR and 505 in IVV, against full books of 50 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 505 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 451 positions EQRR does not, 76.1% of the fund.
Largest: AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AVGO 2.98%, GOOG 2.56%, META 1.94%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EQRR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 2.57% | 7.98% | 5.41% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 2.42% | 3.19% | 0.77% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.06% | 4.01% | 2.95% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.95% | 0.52% | 2.43% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.97% | 1.45% | 0.52% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 3.17% | 0.13% | 3.04% |
| VLOValero Energy | 3.16% | 0.13% | 3.03% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 2.94% | 0.21% | 2.73% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 2.69% | 0.44% | 2.25% |
| BKRBaker Hughes Co | 2.95% | 0.09% | 2.86% |
88.9% of EQRR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EQRR or IVV?
EQRR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EQRR or IVV?
Over the past year EQRR returned +39.61% vs +20.08% for IVV, so EQRR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), EQRR annualized +10.12% vs +14.21% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EQRR or IVV?
EQRR has been the more volatile fund at 25.1% annualized versus 16.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EQRR -59.5% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both EQRR and IVV?
EQRR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EQRR and IVV?
88.9% of EQRR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 23.3% of IVV's is in holdings EQRR also owns. They hold 46 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EQRR and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EQRR or IVV?
EQRR yields 1.07% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EQRR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EQRR led over 1Y and 5Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. EQRR is less concentrated, with 29.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.