FBL vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FBL or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FBL led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $185M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.42% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -26.52% | +13.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | -46.26% | +21.44%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.40%Best | +21.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.77% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 63.8% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -63.2% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.7 years | $65,660Best | $19,875 |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2022 to Sep 3, 2026 (3.7 years).
FBL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FBL vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBL returned -46.26% while VTI returned +21.44%. Year to date, FBL is down 26.52% versus a gain of 13.95% for VTI.
Over three years, FBL compounded at +23.40% per year against +21.10% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, FBL has the edge at +66.30% annualized vs +20.40%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 63.8% compared with 12.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.2% for FBL and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBL charges 1.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $3 annually, a gap of $106 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBL currently yields 3.42% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in FBL and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 66.7% and 92.3% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in FBL and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 2 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FBL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 66.68% | 1.70% | 64.98% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FBL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBL or VTI?
FBL has an expense ratio of 1.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $106 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBL or VTI?
Over the past year FBL returned -46.26% vs +21.44% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FBL annualized +66.30% vs +20.40% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBL or VTI?
FBL has been the more volatile fund at 63.8% annualized versus 12.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FBL -63.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both FBL and VTI?
FBL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBL or VTI?
FBL yields 3.42% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FBL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FBL led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.