FBL vs VOO
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $177M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.22% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -29.94% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -52.44% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.57% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 64.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FBL vs VOO Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBL returned -52.44% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, FBL is down 29.94% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, FBL compounded at +18.57% per year against +21.50% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, FBL has the edge at +65.84% annualized vs +13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 64.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.2% for FBL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBL charges 1.09% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $109 vs $3 annually, a gap of $106 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBL currently yields 3.22% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FBL and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBL or VOO?
FBL has an expense ratio of 1.09% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $106 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FBL or VOO?
Over the past year FBL returned -52.44% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FBL annualized +65.84% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FBL or VOO?
FBL has been the more volatile fund at 64.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FBL -63.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FBL and VOO?
FBL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FBL and VOO?
FBL and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBL or VOO?
FBL yields 3.22% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.