FDIQ vs VXUS
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FDIQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIQ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $45M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.12% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +19.80% | +14.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.41% | +25.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.95% | +20.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.99% | +9.76% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2011 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FDIQ vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDIQ returned +26.41% while VXUS returned +25.40%. Year to date, FDIQ is up 19.80% versus a gain of 14.26% for VXUS.
Over three years, FDIQ compounded at +19.95% per year against +20.47% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.99% and +9.76% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, FDIQ has the edge at +9.36% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDIQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.4% for FDIQ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIQ charges 0.35% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $5 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIQ currently yields 2.12% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FDIQ and VXUS share 11 holdings out of 7891 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIQ or VXUS?
FDIQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDIQ or VXUS?
Over the past year FDIQ returned +26.41% vs +25.40% for VXUS, so FDIQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), FDIQ annualized +9.36% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDIQ or VXUS?
FDIQ has been the more volatile fund at 24.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FDIQ -55.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FDIQ and VXUS?
FDIQ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIQ and VXUS?
FDIQ and VXUS share 11 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7891 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIQ or VXUS?
FDIQ yields 2.12% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.