FDIQ vs VYM
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FDIQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIQ | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $45M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.12% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +20.94% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.20% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.31% | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.78% | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2011 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FDIQ vs VYM Performance
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDIQ returned +27.20% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, FDIQ is up 20.94% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Over three years, FDIQ compounded at +20.31% per year against +18.72% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.78% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, FDIQ has the edge at +9.43% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDIQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.4% for FDIQ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIQ charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIQ currently yields 2.12% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FDIQ and VYM share 6 holdings out of 630 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIQ or VYM?
FDIQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDIQ or VYM?
Over the past year FDIQ returned +27.20% vs +22.16% for VYM, so FDIQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), FDIQ annualized +9.43% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDIQ or VYM?
FDIQ has been the more volatile fund at 24.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FDIQ -55.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FDIQ and VYM?
FDIQ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIQ and VYM?
FDIQ and VYM share 6 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 630 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIQ or VYM?
FDIQ yields 2.12% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.