FDIQ vs VOO
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FDIQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDIQ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $45M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.12% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +20.94% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.20% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.31% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.78% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2011 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FDIQ vs VOO Performance
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDIQ returned +27.20% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, FDIQ is up 20.94% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, FDIQ compounded at +20.31% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.78% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDIQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.4% for FDIQ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDIQ charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDIQ currently yields 2.12% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FDIQ and VOO share 13 holdings out of 525 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDIQ or VOO?
FDIQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDIQ or VOO?
Over the past year FDIQ returned +27.20% vs +20.92% for VOO, so FDIQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), FDIQ annualized +9.43% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDIQ or VOO?
FDIQ has been the more volatile fund at 24.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FDIQ -55.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FDIQ and VOO?
FDIQ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDIQ and VOO?
FDIQ and VOO share 13 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 525 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDIQ or VOO?
FDIQ yields 2.12% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FDIQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.