FDN vs VYM
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $5.0B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +11.18% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.65% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.22% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.11% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -61.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 19, 2006 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FDN vs VYM Performance
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDN returned +8.65% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, FDN is up 11.18% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, FDN compounded at +21.22% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +4.11% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, FDN has the edge at +14.18% annualized vs +7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.5% for FDN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDN charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDN currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDN or VYM?
FDN has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDN or VYM?
Over the past year FDN returned +8.65% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), FDN annualized +14.18% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDN or VYM?
FDN has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FDN -61.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FDN and VYM?
FDN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FDN and VYM?
FDN and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 597 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDN or VYM?
FDN yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.