FDRX vs VYM

FDRX vs VYM

Which is better, FDRX or VYM?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFDRXVYM
Expense Ratio1.08%0.04%Best
AUM$5M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.22%
Holdings52613
YTD Return-3.93%+12.29%Best
1Y Return-+16.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.42%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.12%
Top 10 Weight57.2%26.1%Best
Fund FamilyCorgi Strategies, LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Value
InceptionJan 14, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FDRX vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FDRX vs VYM Performance

Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF (FDRX) is an ETF from Corgi Strategies, LLC and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FDRX is down 3.93% versus a gain of 12.29% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FDRX charges 1.08% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $108 vs $4 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDRX currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

FDRX already in VYM16.1%
VYM already in FDRX3.3%

16.1% of FDRX's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 3.3% of VYM's money is in holdings FDRX also owns.

FDRX and VYM share little of their money.

7 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FDRX and 557 in VYM, against full books of 52 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 521 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FDRX (93.8% of the fund), and 41 for FDRX that do not appear in VYM (79.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FDRXWeight in VYMDifference
ORCLOracle Corp - Common4.64%0.90%3.74%
BLKBlackrock Funding Inc/De3.02%0.68%2.34%
DELLDell Technologies Inc2.63%0.50%2.13%
COFCapital One Financial Corp.2.40%0.53%1.87%
BXBlackstone Group Inc. Class A1.89%0.39%1.50%
APOAthene (Ath) / Apollo Global Management (Apo)0.99%0.21%0.78%
ARESAres Management Corp A0.54%0.10%0.44%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FDRX and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FDRXVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FDRX or VYM?

FDRX has an expense ratio of 1.08% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FDRX and VYM?

16.1% of FDRX's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 3.3% of VYM's is in holdings FDRX also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FDRX and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, FDRX or VYM?

FDRX yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than FDRX?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.