FENY vs VTI
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FENY or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FENY led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FENY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.0B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.24% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 105 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +36.93%Best | +13.60% |
| 1Y Return | +38.36%Best | +18.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.58% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.38%Best | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.7% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -78.9% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $27,451Best | $17,734 |
| Top 10 Weight | 65.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2013 to Sep 25, 2026 (12.9 years).
FENY vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.9 years both funds cover.
FENY vs VTI Performance
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FENY returned +38.36% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, FENY is up 36.93% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, FENY compounded at +14.58% per year against +23.04% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +22.38% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.32% annualized vs +3.96%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FENY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.7% compared with 14.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.9% for FENY and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FENY charges 0.08% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FENY currently yields 2.24% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.5% of FENY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.4% of VTI's money is in holdings FENY also owns.
Most of FENY is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
89 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in FENY and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 105 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,098 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FENY (94.1% of the fund), and 8 for FENY that do not appear in VTI (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FENY | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 21.74% | 0.89% | 20.85% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 14.02% | 0.52% | 13.50% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 5.99% | 0.20% | 5.79% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 4.06% | 0.13% | 3.93% |
| VLOValero Energy | 3.97% | 0.13% | 3.84% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 3.65% | 0.12% | 3.53% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 3.35% | 0.12% | 3.23% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 3.29% | 0.10% | 3.19% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 2.89% | 0.11% | 2.78% |
| BKRBaker Hughes Co | 2.31% | 0.08% | 2.23% |
97.5% of FENY is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FENY or VTI?
FENY has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FENY or VTI?
Over the past year FENY returned +38.36% vs +18.17% for VTI, so FENY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FENY annualized +3.96% vs +12.32% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FENY or VTI?
FENY has been the more volatile fund at 28.7% annualized versus 14.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FENY -78.9% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both FENY and VTI?
FENY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FENY and VTI?
97.5% of FENY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.4% of VTI's is in holdings FENY also owns. They hold 89 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in FENY and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FENY or VTI?
FENY yields 2.24% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FENY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FENY?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FENY led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.