FFGX vs VTI
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FFGX or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FFGX led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. FFGX is less concentrated, with 26.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFGX | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.50% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 177 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +10.18% | +12.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.34% | +16.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.83% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,753Best | $12,949 |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.8%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 21, 2024 to Sep 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
FFGX vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
FFGX vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF (FFGX) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFGX returned +14.34% while VTI returned +16.31%. Year to date, FFGX is up 10.18% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 12.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for FFGX and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFGX charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFGX currently yields 1.50% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 167 holdings in FFGX and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.7% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 167 positions we hold weights for in FFGX and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 177 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FFGX (97.5% of the fund), and 6 for FFGX that do not appear in VTI (2.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFGX and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFGX or VTI?
FFGX has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFGX or VTI?
Over the past year FFGX returned +14.34% vs +16.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFGX annualized +19.37% vs +15.44% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFGX or VTI?
FFGX has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 12.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FFGX -14.8% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both FFGX and VTI?
FFGX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFGX or VTI?
FFGX yields 1.50% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FFGX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FFGX?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FFGX led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. FFGX is less concentrated, with 26.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.