FFGX vs VTI
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFGX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $54M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.54% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 174 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.07% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.82% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
FFGX vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF (FFGX) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFGX returned +19.82% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, FFGX is up 12.07% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.5% for FFGX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for FFGX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFGX charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFGX currently yields 1.54% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FFGX and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2958 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFGX | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FBK | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFGX or VTI?
FFGX has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFGX or VTI?
Over the past year FFGX returned +19.82% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFGX annualized +21.38% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFGX or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.5% for FFGX. Worst drawdown: FFGX -14.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FFGX and VTI?
FFGX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFGX and VTI?
FFGX and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2958 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFGX or VTI?
FFGX yields 1.54% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FFGX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.