FFGX vs VXUS
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, FFGX or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFGX | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.54% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 177 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +13.38% | +16.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.88% | +27.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.09% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 11.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -13.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $14,226 | $15,457Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 21, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (1.8 years).
FFGX vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
FFGX vs VXUS Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF (FFGX) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFGX returned +21.88% while VXUS returned +27.58%. Year to date, FFGX is up 13.38% versus a gain of 16.15% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 11.5% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for FFGX and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFGX charges 0.55% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $5 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFGX currently yields 1.54% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 66.6% of FFGX's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
117 positions in common, counted across the 172 positions we hold weights for in FFGX and 8,092 in VXUS, against full books of 177 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFGX | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Nv Unsponsored Adr Ordinary Shares | 2.79% | 1.70% | 1.09% |
| 000660:KRSk Hynix Inc | 2.14% | 2.17% | 0.03% |
| SAN:MABanco Santander S.a. | 1.73% | 0.45% | 1.28% |
| RR:LNRolls-Royce Holdings PLC Ord Gbp0.20 | 1.72% | 0.36% | 1.36% |
| SAF:PASafran Sa | 1.47% | 0.30% | 1.17% |
| 48CA:MACaixabank Sa | 1.59% | 0.12% | 1.47% |
| UCG:MIUnicredit Spa | 1.37% | 0.30% | 1.07% |
| 8306:JPMitsubishi Ufj Financial Group | 1.19% | 0.48% | 0.71% |
| 6501:JPHitachi Ltd | 1.36% | 0.27% | 1.09% |
| FNV:CAFranco-Nevada Corp | 1.52% | 0.09% | 1.43% |
66.6% of FFGX is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFGX or VXUS?
FFGX has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFGX or VXUS?
Over the past year FFGX returned +21.88% vs +27.58% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFGX annualized +21.63% vs +27.37% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFGX or VXUS?
FFGX has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 11.5% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FFGX -14.8% vs VXUS -13.6%.
Should I hold both FFGX and VXUS?
FFGX and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FFGX and VXUS?
At least 66.6% of FFGX's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 117 positions in common, counted across the 172 positions we hold weights for in FFGX and 8,092 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFGX or VXUS?
FFGX yields 1.54% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than FFGX?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.