FFGX vs VOO
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FFGX or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FFGX led over the full window, VOO over 1Y. FFGX is less concentrated, with 25.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFGX | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.50% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 177 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +12.10% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.93% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $14,012Best | $13,148 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.6%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 21, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.8 years).
FFGX vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
FFGX vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF (FFGX) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFGX returned +16.93% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, FFGX is up 12.10% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 12.7% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for FFGX and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFGX charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFGX currently yields 1.50% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 172 holdings in FFGX and 505 in VOO, totalling 100.1% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 172 positions we hold weights for in FFGX and 505 in VOO, against full books of 177 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FFGX (99.4% of the fund), and 7 for FFGX that do not appear in VOO (2.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFGX and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFGX or VOO?
FFGX has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFGX or VOO?
Over the past year FFGX returned +16.93% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFGX annualized +20.61% vs +16.42% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFGX or VOO?
FFGX has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 12.7% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FFGX -14.8% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both FFGX and VOO?
FFGX and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFGX or VOO?
FFGX yields 1.50% while VOO yields 1.04%, so FFGX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FFGX?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FFGX led over the full window, VOO over 1Y. FFGX is less concentrated, with 25.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.