FFGX vs VOO
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFGX | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $54M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.54% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 174 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.10% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.59% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FFGX vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF (FFGX) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFGX returned +19.59% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, FFGX is up 12.10% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.5% for FFGX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for FFGX and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFGX charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFGX currently yields 1.54% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FFGX and VOO share 0 holdings out of 677 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFGX or VOO?
FFGX has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFGX or VOO?
Over the past year FFGX returned +19.59% vs +21.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFGX annualized +21.43% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFGX or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.5% for FFGX. Worst drawdown: FFGX -14.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FFGX and VOO?
FFGX and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFGX and VOO?
FFGX and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 677 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFGX or VOO?
FFGX yields 1.54% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FFGX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.