FFGX vs VYM
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFGX | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $54M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.54% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 174 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +12.10% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.59% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FFGX vs VYM Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF (FFGX) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFGX returned +19.59% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, FFGX is up 12.10% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.5% for FFGX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for FFGX and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFGX charges 0.55% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $4 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFGX currently yields 1.54% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FFGX and VYM share 1 holdings out of 774 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFGX | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | 0.80% | 0.11% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFGX or VYM?
FFGX has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFGX or VYM?
Over the past year FFGX returned +19.59% vs +23.48% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFGX annualized +21.43% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFGX or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.5% for FFGX. Worst drawdown: FFGX -14.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FFGX and VYM?
FFGX and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFGX and VYM?
FFGX and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 774 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFGX or VYM?
FFGX yields 1.54% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.