FFGX vs VYM
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FFGX or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. FFGX is less concentrated, with 24.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFGX | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $51M | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.78% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 200 | 610 |
| YTD Return | +4.01% | +15.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.44% | +19.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 11.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $13,053 | $13,140Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.1%Best | 25.8% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 21, 2024 to Nov 13, 2026 (2 years).
FFGX vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
FFGX vs VYM Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-US ETF (FFGX) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFGX returned +6.44% while VYM returned +19.62%. Year to date, FFGX is up 4.01% versus a gain of 15.95% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.9% compared with 11.1% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for FFGX and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFGX charges 0.55% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $4 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFGX currently yields 1.78% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 179 holdings in FFGX and 602 in VYM, totalling 100.1% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, FFGX as of Nov 2, 2026 and VYM as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 179 positions we hold weights for in FFGX and 602 in VYM, against full books of 200 and 610.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 575 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FFGX (98.6% of the fund), and 12 for FFGX that do not appear in VYM (7.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FFGX and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFGX or VYM?
FFGX has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FFGX or VYM?
Over the past year FFGX returned +6.44% vs +19.62% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFGX annualized +14.25% vs +14.63% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FFGX or VYM?
FFGX has been the more volatile fund at 13.9% annualized versus 11.1% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FFGX -14.8% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both FFGX and VYM?
FFGX and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFGX or VYM?
FFGX yields 1.78% while VYM yields 2.23%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FFGX?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. FFGX is less concentrated, with 24.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.