FIDU vs VTI
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FIDU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.3B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 360 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.91% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.65% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.84% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.56% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
FIDU vs VTI Performance
Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FIDU returned +20.65% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, FIDU is up 13.91% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, FIDU compounded at +20.84% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.56% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, FIDU has the edge at +11.48% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FIDU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.7% for FIDU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FIDU charges 0.08% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FIDU currently yields 0.95% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FIDU and VTI share 276 holdings out of 2865 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FIDU or VTI?
FIDU has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FIDU or VTI?
Over the past year FIDU returned +20.65% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FIDU annualized +11.48% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FIDU or VTI?
FIDU has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FIDU -42.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FIDU and VTI?
FIDU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FIDU and VTI?
FIDU and VTI share 276 common holdings with a 9.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2865 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FIDU or VTI?
FIDU yields 0.95% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.