FLDZ vs VTI
TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FLDZ or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FLDZ is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLDZ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 62 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -2.40% | +11.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.64% | +15.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.78% | +20.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 15.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.5%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 4.7 years | $11,835 | $16,276Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 19.6%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 3, 2022 to Sep 16, 2026 (4.7 years).
FLDZ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.
FLDZ vs VTI Performance
TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF (FLDZ) is an ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLDZ returned -3.64% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, FLDZ is down 2.40% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Over three years, FLDZ compounded at +8.78% per year against +20.48% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLDZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for FLDZ and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLDZ charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLDZ currently yields 1.49% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
79.6% of FLDZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.8% of VTI's money is in holdings FLDZ also owns.
Most of FLDZ is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
50 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in FLDZ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 62 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,117 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FLDZ (94.7% of the fund), and 5 for FLDZ that do not appear in VTI (8.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLDZ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 2.28% | 0.37% | 1.91% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 1.74% | 0.40% | 1.34% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 1.58% | 0.52% | 1.06% |
| BETABeta Technologies Inc Class A | 2.08% | 0.00% | 2.08% |
| ACHRArcher Aviation Inc | 1.99% | 0.00% | 1.99% |
| NPKNational Presto Industries | 1.99% | 0.00% | 1.99% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 1.78% | 0.19% | 1.59% |
| SPCEVirgin Gaming | 1.94% | 0.00% | 1.94% |
| ATIAti Inc | 1.87% | 0.04% | 1.83% |
| HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries Inc. | 1.88% | 0.02% | 1.86% |
79.6% of FLDZ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLDZ or VTI?
FLDZ has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLDZ or VTI?
Over the past year FLDZ returned -3.64% vs +15.41% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLDZ or VTI?
FLDZ has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FLDZ -19.5% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both FLDZ and VTI?
FLDZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLDZ and VTI?
79.6% of FLDZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.8% of VTI's is in holdings FLDZ also owns. They hold 50 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in FLDZ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLDZ or VTI?
FLDZ yields 1.49% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FLDZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FLDZ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FLDZ is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.