FLDZ vs VYM

FLDZ vs VYM

Which is better, FLDZ or VYM?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FLDZ is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMLess Concentrated: FLDZ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLDZVYM
Expense Ratio0.40%0.04%Best
AUM$6M$81.6B
Dividend Yield1.49%2.22%
Holdings62613
YTD Return-2.40%+11.71%Best
1Y Return-3.64%+16.24%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+8.78%+17.24%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.86%
Volatility (annualized)16.1%13.8%Best
Max Drawdown-19.5%-15.8%Best
$10,000 over 4.7 years$11,835$16,152Best
Top 10 Weight19.6%Best26.1%
Fund FamilyTrueSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionDec 31, 2021Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 3, 2022 to Sep 16, 2026 (4.7 years).

FLDZ vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.

FLDZ vs VYM Performance

TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF (FLDZ) is an ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLDZ returned -3.64% while VYM returned +16.24%. Year to date, FLDZ is down 2.40% versus a gain of 11.71% for VYM.

Over three years, FLDZ compounded at +8.78% per year against +17.24% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FLDZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 13.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for FLDZ and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FLDZ charges 0.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $4 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLDZ currently yields 1.49% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

FLDZ already in VYM8.5%
VYM already in FLDZ1.4%

8.5% of FLDZ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.4% of VYM's money is in holdings FLDZ also owns.

FLDZ and VYM share little of their money.

5 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in FLDZ and 557 in VYM, against full books of 62 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 523 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FLDZ (95.6% of the fund), and 50 for FLDZ that do not appear in VYM (79.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FLDZWeight in VYMDifference
LMTLockheed Martin Corp1.78%0.48%1.30%
GDGeneral Dynamics Corp.1.65%0.40%1.25%
NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp.1.66%0.29%1.37%
HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries Inc.1.88%0.05%1.83%
LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc.1.53%0.21%1.32%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FLDZ and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FLDZVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FLDZ or VYM?

FLDZ has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FLDZ or VYM?

Over the past year FLDZ returned -3.64% vs +16.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FLDZ or VYM?

FLDZ has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 13.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FLDZ -19.5% vs VYM -15.8%.

Should I hold both FLDZ and VYM?

FLDZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between FLDZ and VYM?

8.5% of FLDZ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 1.4% of VYM's is in holdings FLDZ also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in FLDZ and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, FLDZ or VYM?

FLDZ yields 1.49% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than FLDZ?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FLDZ is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.