FLDZ vs IVV
TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FLDZ or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FLDZ is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLDZ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 62 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -2.58% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | -4.66% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.80% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.5%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 4.7 years | $11,808 | $17,020Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 19.6%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 3, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.7 years).
FLDZ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.
FLDZ vs IVV Performance
TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF (FLDZ) is an ETF from TrueShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FLDZ returned -4.66% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, FLDZ is down 2.58% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, FLDZ compounded at +8.80% per year against +21.38% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLDZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for FLDZ and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLDZ charges 0.40% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLDZ currently yields 1.49% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
21.8% of FLDZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.7% of IVV's money is in holdings FLDZ also owns.
FLDZ and IVV share little of their money.
13 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in FLDZ and 490 in IVV, against full books of 62 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 469 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FLDZ (95.9% of the fund), and 42 for FLDZ that do not appear in IVV (65.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLDZ | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 2.28% | 0.65% | 1.63% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 1.74% | 0.42% | 1.32% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 1.58% | 0.53% | 1.05% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 1.78% | 0.17% | 1.61% |
| HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries Inc. | 1.88% | 0.02% | 1.86% |
| BABoeing Co | 1.58% | 0.25% | 1.33% |
| GDGeneral Dynamics Corp. | 1.65% | 0.14% | 1.51% |
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp. | 1.66% | 0.11% | 1.55% |
| HWMHowmet Aerospace Inc. | 1.58% | 0.15% | 1.43% |
| TDGTransdigm Group Inc. | 1.55% | 0.10% | 1.45% |
21.8% of FLDZ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLDZ or IVV?
FLDZ has an expense ratio of 0.40% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLDZ or IVV?
Over the past year FLDZ returned -4.66% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLDZ or IVV?
FLDZ has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FLDZ -19.5% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both FLDZ and IVV?
FLDZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLDZ and IVV?
21.8% of FLDZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.7% of IVV's is in holdings FLDZ also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in FLDZ and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLDZ or IVV?
FLDZ yields 1.49% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FLDZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FLDZ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. FLDZ is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.