FLJH vs IVV

FLJH vs IVV

Which is better, FLJH or IVV?

Each has led over a different period.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. FLJH led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IVV over the full window. FLJH is less concentrated, with 25.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: FLJH

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLJHIVV
Expense Ratio0.09%0.03%Best
AUM$206M$876.4B
Dividend Yield2.42%1.06%
Holdings490508
YTD Return+19.02%Best+11.57%
1Y Return+28.23%Best+17.57%
3Y Return (annualized)+23.78%Best+20.71%
5Y Return (annualized)+18.93%Best+12.80%
Volatility (annualized)15.0%Best16.3%
Max Drawdown-35.2%-33.9%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$23,793Best$18,262
Top 10 Weight25.3%Best37.9%
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 2, 2017May 15, 2000

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Sep 10, 2026 (8.8 years).

FLJH vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.8 years both funds cover.

FLJH vs IVV Performance

Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FLJH returned +28.23% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, FLJH is up 19.02% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.

Over three years, FLJH compounded at +23.78% per year against +20.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +18.93% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.87% annualized vs +13.22%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.0% for FLJH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.2% for FLJH and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FLJH charges 0.09% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJH currently yields 2.42% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 471 holdings in FLJH and 505 in IVV, totalling 99.2% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 471 positions we hold weights for in FLJH and 505 in IVV, against full books of 490 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 495 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FLJH (99.3% of the fund), and 0 for FLJH that do not appear in IVV (0.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FLJH and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FLJHIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FLJH or IVV?

FLJH has an expense ratio of 0.09% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FLJH or IVV?

Over the past year FLJH returned +28.23% vs +17.57% for IVV, so FLJH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLJH annualized +13.22% vs +13.87% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FLJH or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.0% for FLJH. Worst drawdown: FLJH -35.2% vs IVV -33.9%.

Should I hold both FLJH and IVV?

FLJH and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FLJH or IVV?

FLJH yields 2.42% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FLJH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than FLJH?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. FLJH led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IVV over the full window. FLJH is less concentrated, with 25.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.