FLJH vs VXUS
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FLJH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLJH | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $182M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.49% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 488 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +22.10% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.13% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.46% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.16% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FLJH vs VXUS Performance
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLJH returned +39.13% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, FLJH is up 22.10% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, FLJH compounded at +26.46% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +21.16% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLJH has the edge at +13.70% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 15.0% for FLJH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.2% for FLJH and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLJH charges 0.09% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $5 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJH currently yields 2.49% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FLJH and VXUS share 288 holdings out of 8049 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLJH or VXUS?
FLJH has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLJH or VXUS?
Over the past year FLJH returned +39.13% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so FLJH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLJH annualized +13.70% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLJH or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 15.0% for FLJH. Worst drawdown: FLJH -35.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FLJH and VXUS?
FLJH and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLJH and VXUS?
FLJH and VXUS share 288 common holdings with a 6.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8049 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLJH or VXUS?
FLJH yields 2.49% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.