FLJH vs VXUS

FLJH vs VXUS

Which is better, FLJH or VXUS?

FLJH has been ahead.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FLJH led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: FLJH

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFLJHVXUS
Expense Ratio0.09%0.05%Best
AUM$206M$158.1B
Dividend Yield2.42%2.51%
Holdings4908,747
YTD Return+19.02%Best+13.35%
1Y Return+28.23%Best+22.44%
3Y Return (annualized)+23.78%Best+19.44%
5Y Return (annualized)+18.93%Best+8.82%
Volatility (annualized)15.0%Best15.8%
Max Drawdown-35.2%Best-39.9%
$10,000 over 5 years$23,793Best$15,260
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 2, 2017Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Sep 10, 2026 (8.8 years).

FLJH vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.8 years both funds cover.

FLJH vs VXUS Performance

Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLJH returned +28.23% while VXUS returned +22.44%. Year to date, FLJH is up 19.02% versus a gain of 13.35% for VXUS.

Over three years, FLJH compounded at +23.78% per year against +19.44% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +18.93% and +8.82% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLJH has the edge at +13.22% annualized vs +6.96%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 15.0% for FLJH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.2% for FLJH and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FLJH charges 0.09% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $5 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJH currently yields 2.42% against 2.51% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

FLJH already in VXUS58.0%

At least 58.0% of FLJH's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, FLJH as of Aug 31, 2026 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

308 positions in common, counted across the 471 positions we hold weights for in FLJH and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 490 and 8,747.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FLJHWeight in VXUSDifference
8306:JPMitsubishi Ufj Financial Group, Inc.3.87%0.48%3.39%
8035:JPTokyo Electron Ltd. Com Stk2.42%0.47%1.95%
8316:JPSumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc. Shs2.45%0.31%2.14%
6501:JPHitachi Ltd2.33%0.27%2.06%
6758:JPSony Group Corp2.30%0.26%2.04%
8411:JPMizuho Financial Group Inc. Com Stk1.97%0.25%1.72%
285A:JPKioxia Holdings Corp1.62%0.43%1.19%
8058:JPMitsubishi Corp1.49%0.19%1.30%
6981:JPMurata Mfg Co1.22%0.28%0.94%
8001:JPItochu Corp Common Stock1.28%0.16%1.12%

58.0% of FLJH is already inside VXUS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FLJHVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FLJH or VXUS?

FLJH has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FLJH or VXUS?

Over the past year FLJH returned +28.23% vs +22.44% for VXUS, so FLJH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLJH annualized +13.22% vs +6.96% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FLJH or VXUS?

VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 15.0% for FLJH. Worst drawdown: FLJH -35.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.

Should I hold both FLJH and VXUS?

FLJH and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between FLJH and VXUS?

At least 58.0% of FLJH's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 308 positions in common, counted across the 471 positions we hold weights for in FLJH and 8,091 in VXUS.

Which pays a higher dividend, FLJH or VXUS?

FLJH yields 2.42% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than FLJH?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FLJH led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.