FLJH vs VYM
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FLJH or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FLJH led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FLJH is less concentrated, with 25.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLJH | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $206M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.42% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 490 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +19.02%Best | +13.15% |
| 1Y Return | +28.23%Best | +17.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.78%Best | +17.99% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.93%Best | +12.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0%Tie | 15.0%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -35.2%Best | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $23,793Best | $17,750 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.3%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Sep 10, 2026 (8.8 years).
FLJH vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.8 years both funds cover.
FLJH vs VYM Performance
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLJH returned +28.23% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, FLJH is up 19.02% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Over three years, FLJH compounded at +23.78% per year against +17.99% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +18.93% and +12.16% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLJH has the edge at +13.22% annualized vs +9.85%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLJH and VYM have been equally volatile, both at 15.0% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.2% for FLJH and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLJH charges 0.09% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $4 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJH currently yields 2.42% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 471 holdings in FLJH and 603 in VYM, totalling 99.2% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, FLJH as of Aug 31, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 471 positions we hold weights for in FLJH and 603 in VYM, against full books of 490 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 568 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FLJH (97.5% of the fund), and 0 for FLJH that do not appear in VYM (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLJH and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLJH or VYM?
FLJH has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLJH or VYM?
Over the past year FLJH returned +28.23% vs +17.82% for VYM, so FLJH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLJH annualized +13.22% vs +9.85% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLJH or VYM?
FLJH and VYM have been equally volatile, both at 15.0% annualized. Worst drawdown: FLJH -35.2% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both FLJH and VYM?
FLJH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLJH or VYM?
FLJH yields 2.42% while VYM yields 2.22%, so FLJH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FLJH?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FLJH led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FLJH is less concentrated, with 25.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.