FLJH vs VYM
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FLJH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLJH | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $182M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.49% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 488 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +24.57% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.88% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.23% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.36% | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FLJH vs VYM Performance
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLJH returned +36.88% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, FLJH is up 24.57% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Over three years, FLJH compounded at +27.23% per year against +18.54% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +21.36% and +12.25% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLJH has the edge at +13.94% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLJH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.2% for FLJH and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLJH charges 0.09% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $4 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJH currently yields 2.49% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FLJH and VYM share 0 holdings out of 1034 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLJH or VYM?
FLJH has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLJH or VYM?
Over the past year FLJH returned +36.88% vs +25.03% for VYM, so FLJH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLJH annualized +13.94% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLJH or VYM?
FLJH has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FLJH -35.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FLJH and VYM?
FLJH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLJH and VYM?
FLJH and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1034 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLJH or VYM?
FLJH yields 2.49% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.