FLJH vs VTI
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FLJH or VTI?
FLJH has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FLJH led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLJH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $206M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.42% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 490 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +21.22%Best | +12.57% |
| 1Y Return | +28.56%Best | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.31%Best | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.02%Best | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0%Best | 16.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.2% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $23,884Best | $17,514 |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Sep 11, 2026 (8.8 years).
FLJH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.8 years both funds cover.
FLJH vs VTI Performance
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLJH returned +28.56% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, FLJH is up 21.22% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Over three years, FLJH compounded at +24.31% per year against +20.87% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +19.02% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLJH has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +13.45%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.0% for FLJH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.2% for FLJH and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLJH charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJH currently yields 2.42% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 471 holdings in FLJH and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 99.2% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, FLJH as of Aug 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 471 positions we hold weights for in FLJH and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 490 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLJH and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLJH or VTI?
FLJH has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLJH or VTI?
Over the past year FLJH returned +28.56% vs +17.22% for VTI, so FLJH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLJH annualized +13.45% vs +13.45% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLJH or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.0% for FLJH. Worst drawdown: FLJH -35.2% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both FLJH and VTI?
FLJH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLJH or VTI?
FLJH yields 2.42% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FLJH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FLJH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FLJH led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.