FLJH vs VOO
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FLJH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLJH | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $182M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.49% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 488 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +25.28% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +38.08% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.44% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.62% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FLJH vs VOO Performance
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLJH returned +38.08% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, FLJH is up 25.28% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, FLJH compounded at +27.44% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +21.62% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLJH has the edge at +14.01% annualized vs +13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLJH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.2% for FLJH and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLJH charges 0.09% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJH currently yields 2.49% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FLJH and VOO share 0 holdings out of 981 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLJH or VOO?
FLJH has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLJH or VOO?
Over the past year FLJH returned +38.08% vs +22.02% for VOO, so FLJH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLJH annualized +14.01% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLJH or VOO?
FLJH has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FLJH -35.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FLJH and VOO?
FLJH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLJH and VOO?
FLJH and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 981 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLJH or VOO?
FLJH yields 2.49% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FLJH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.