FLJP vs VTI
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FLJP or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FLJP led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FLJP is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLJP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4.1B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.11% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 481 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +19.74%Best | +14.43% |
| 1Y Return | +27.41%Best | +18.05% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.36% | +22.93%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.35% | +12.74%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3%Best | 16.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.6%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,363 | $18,213Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.4%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2017 to Oct 12, 2026 (8.9 years).
FLJP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.
FLJP vs VTI Performance
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLJP returned +27.41% while VTI returned +18.05%. Year to date, FLJP is up 19.74% versus a gain of 14.43% for VTI.
Over three years, FLJP compounded at +21.36% per year against +22.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.35% and +12.74% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.52% annualized vs +7.43%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 14.3% for FLJP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for FLJP and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLJP charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJP currently yields 4.11% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 463 holdings in FLJP and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.1% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, FLJP as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 463 positions we hold weights for in FLJP and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 481 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FLJP (97.5% of the fund), and 1 for FLJP that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLJP and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLJP or VTI?
FLJP has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLJP or VTI?
Over the past year FLJP returned +27.41% vs +18.05% for VTI, so FLJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLJP annualized +7.43% vs +13.52% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLJP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 14.3% for FLJP. Worst drawdown: FLJP -33.6% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both FLJP and VTI?
FLJP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLJP or VTI?
FLJP yields 4.11% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FLJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FLJP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FLJP led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. FLJP is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.