FLJP vs VTI
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FLJP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLJP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.9B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.27% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 482 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.53% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.31% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.08% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.81% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
FLJP vs VTI Performance
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLJP returned +28.31% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, FLJP is up 18.53% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, FLJP compounded at +20.08% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.81% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +7.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.4% for FLJP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for FLJP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLJP charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJP currently yields 4.27% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FLJP and VTI share 0 holdings out of 3250 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLJP or VTI?
FLJP has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLJP or VTI?
Over the past year FLJP returned +28.31% vs +23.31% for VTI, so FLJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLJP annualized +7.46% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLJP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.4% for FLJP. Worst drawdown: FLJP -33.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FLJP and VTI?
FLJP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLJP and VTI?
FLJP and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3250 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLJP or VTI?
FLJP yields 4.27% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FLJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.