FLJP vs VXUS
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FLJP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLJP | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $3.9B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.27% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 482 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +18.29% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.05% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.64% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FLJP vs VXUS Performance
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLJP returned +28.05% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, FLJP is up 18.29% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Over three years, FLJP compounded at +19.64% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.04% and +9.14% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLJP has the edge at +7.44% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.4% for FLJP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for FLJP and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLJP charges 0.09% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $5 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJP currently yields 4.27% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FLJP and VXUS share 304 holdings out of 8024 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLJP or VXUS?
FLJP has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLJP or VXUS?
Over the past year FLJP returned +28.05% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so FLJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLJP annualized +7.44% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLJP or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.4% for FLJP. Worst drawdown: FLJP -33.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FLJP and VXUS?
FLJP and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLJP and VXUS?
FLJP and VXUS share 304 common holdings with a 6.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8024 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLJP or VXUS?
FLJP yields 4.27% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so FLJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.