FLJP vs VYM
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FLJP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLJP | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $3.9B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.27% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 482 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +18.29% | +16.10% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.05% | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.64% | +18.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FLJP vs VYM Performance
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLJP returned +28.05% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, FLJP is up 18.29% versus a gain of 16.10% for VYM.
Over three years, FLJP compounded at +19.64% per year against +18.29% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.04% and +12.35% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLJP has the edge at +7.44% annualized vs +7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.4% for FLJP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for FLJP and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLJP charges 0.09% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $4 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJP currently yields 4.27% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FLJP and VYM share 0 holdings out of 1025 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLJP or VYM?
FLJP has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLJP or VYM?
Over the past year FLJP returned +28.05% vs +25.99% for VYM, so FLJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLJP annualized +7.44% vs +7.08% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLJP or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.4% for FLJP. Worst drawdown: FLJP -33.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FLJP and VYM?
FLJP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLJP and VYM?
FLJP and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1025 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLJP or VYM?
FLJP yields 4.27% while VYM yields 2.86%, so FLJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.