FLJP vs VOO
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FLJP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLJP | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.9B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.27% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 482 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +18.29% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.05% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.64% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FLJP vs VOO Performance
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLJP returned +28.05% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, FLJP is up 18.29% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, FLJP compounded at +19.64% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.04% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLJP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for FLJP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLJP charges 0.09% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLJP currently yields 4.27% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FLJP and VOO share 0 holdings out of 972 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLJP or VOO?
FLJP has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLJP or VOO?
Over the past year FLJP returned +28.05% vs +23.01% for VOO, so FLJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLJP annualized +7.44% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLJP or VOO?
FLJP has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FLJP -33.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FLJP and VOO?
FLJP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLJP and VOO?
FLJP and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 972 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLJP or VOO?
FLJP yields 4.27% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FLJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.