FLQM vs VYM
Franklin US Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLQM | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.51% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 209 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +8.42% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.62% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.51% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.25% | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FLQM vs VYM Performance
Franklin US Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQM) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLQM returned +10.62% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, FLQM is up 8.42% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Over three years, FLQM compounded at +11.51% per year against +18.54% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.25% and +12.25% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLQM has the edge at +11.24% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLQM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.3% for FLQM and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLQM charges 0.30% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $4 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLQM currently yields 1.51% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FLQM and VYM share 9 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLQM or VYM?
FLQM has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLQM or VYM?
Over the past year FLQM returned +10.62% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLQM annualized +11.24% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLQM or VYM?
FLQM has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FLQM -37.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FLQM and VYM?
FLQM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FLQM and VYM?
FLQM and VYM share 9 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLQM or VYM?
FLQM yields 1.51% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.