FLQM vs VTI
Franklin US Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FLQM or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLQM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.64% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 207 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +7.54% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.74% | +20.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.91% | +20.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.89% | +11.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 16.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.3% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,954 | $17,474Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 28, 2017 to Sep 4, 2026 (9.4 years).
FLQM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.4 years both funds cover.
FLQM vs VTI Performance
Franklin US Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQM) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLQM returned +6.74% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, FLQM is up 7.54% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, FLQM compounded at +11.91% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.89% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.77% annualized vs +11.06%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLQM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 16.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.3% for FLQM and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLQM charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLQM currently yields 1.64% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 83.0% of FLQM's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of FLQM is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
160 positions in common, counted across the 205 positions we hold weights for in FLQM and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 207 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLQM | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXPEExpedia Group Inc (consumer Discretionary) | 1.28% | 0.04% | 1.24% |
| GRMNGarminltd. | 1.22% | 0.05% | 1.17% |
| ALLAllstate Corp. | 1.18% | 0.08% | 1.10% |
| PRUPrudential Financial Inc | 1.14% | 0.05% | 1.09% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 1.14% | 0.04% | 1.10% |
| WSMWilliams-sonoma Inc | 1.14% | 0.04% | 1.10% |
| UALUnited Airlines Holdings Inc. | 1.07% | 0.06% | 1.01% |
| CORCencora Inc | 1.06% | 0.07% | 0.99% |
| DALDl Co., Ltd. | 1.05% | 0.08% | 0.97% |
| FASTFastenal Co. | 1.05% | 0.08% | 0.97% |
83.0% of FLQM is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLQM or VTI?
FLQM has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLQM or VTI?
Over the past year FLQM returned +6.74% vs +20.00% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLQM annualized +11.06% vs +13.77% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLQM or VTI?
FLQM has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 16.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FLQM -37.3% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both FLQM and VTI?
FLQM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLQM and VTI?
At least 83.0% of FLQM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 160 positions in common, counted across the 205 positions we hold weights for in FLQM and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLQM or VTI?
FLQM yields 1.64% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FLQM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FLQM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.