FLQM vs VTI
Franklin US Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLQM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.64% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 209 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.88% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.08% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.01% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.25% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
FLQM vs VTI Performance
Franklin US Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQM) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLQM returned +10.08% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, FLQM is up 8.88% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, FLQM compounded at +12.01% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.25% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLQM has the edge at +11.28% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLQM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.3% for FLQM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLQM charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLQM currently yields 1.64% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FLQM and VTI share 160 holdings out of 2832 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLQM or VTI?
FLQM has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLQM or VTI?
Over the past year FLQM returned +10.08% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLQM annualized +11.28% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLQM or VTI?
FLQM has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FLQM -37.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FLQM and VTI?
FLQM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FLQM and VTI?
FLQM and VTI share 160 common holdings with a 3.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2832 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLQM or VTI?
FLQM yields 1.64% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FLQM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.