FLQS vs VOO
Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLQS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $53M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.33% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 499 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +17.36% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.54% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.23% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.85% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FLQS vs VOO Performance
Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQS) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLQS returned +18.54% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, FLQS is up 17.36% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, FLQS compounded at +13.23% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.85% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLQS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.2% for FLQS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLQS charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLQS currently yields 1.33% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FLQS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 996 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLQS or VOO?
FLQS has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLQS or VOO?
Over the past year FLQS returned +18.54% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLQS annualized +9.05% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLQS or VOO?
FLQS has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FLQS -42.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FLQS and VOO?
FLQS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLQS and VOO?
FLQS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 996 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLQS or VOO?
FLQS yields 1.33% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FLQS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.