FLSP vs VTI
Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLSP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.61% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 598 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.47% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.52% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.24% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.02% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 18, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
FLSP vs VTI Performance
Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLSP returned +15.52% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, FLSP is up 5.47% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, FLSP compounded at +10.24% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.02% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 8.1% for FLSP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for FLSP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.07. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLSP charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLSP currently yields 2.61% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FLSP and VTI share 265 holdings out of 3000 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLSP or VTI?
FLSP has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLSP or VTI?
Over the past year FLSP returned +15.52% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), FLSP annualized +4.54% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLSP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 8.1% for FLSP. Worst drawdown: FLSP -22.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FLSP and VTI?
FLSP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.07, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLSP and VTI?
FLSP and VTI share 265 common holdings with a 17.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3000 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLSP or VTI?
FLSP yields 2.61% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FLSP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.