FMCE vs IVV
FM Compounders Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FMCE or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMCE | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $69M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.82% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 31 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +9.56% | +14.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.13% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.17% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.85% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.4%Best | 12.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.7%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $11,898 | $13,316Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.8% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | First Manhattan | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 11, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026 (1.9 years).
FMCE vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
FMCE vs IVV Performance
FM Compounders Equity ETF (FMCE) is an ETF from First Manhattan and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FMCE returned +9.13% while IVV returned +17.31%. Year to date, FMCE is up 9.56% versus a gain of 14.15% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 11.4% for FMCE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.7% for FMCE and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMCE charges 0.71% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $3 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMCE currently yields 2.82% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
79.7% of FMCE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 28.2% of IVV's money is in holdings FMCE also owns.
Most of FMCE is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 92 days apart, FMCE as of May 31, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
26 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in FMCE and 490 in IVV, against full books of 31 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 456 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FMCE (70.5% of the fund), and 2 for FMCE that do not appear in IVV (14.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FMCE | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.42% | 5.69% | 0.27% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.11% | 8.07% | 6.96% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.55% | 3.84% | 0.71% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 5.45% | 0.67% | 4.78% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 4.02% | 1.39% | 2.63% |
| KKRKkr & Co. Inc. Class a | 5.22% | 0.11% | 5.11% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.28% | 0.95% | 3.33% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 4.45% | 0.53% | 3.92% |
| HONHoneywell International Inc. | 4.44% | 0.10% | 4.34% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.49% | 1.90% | 0.59% |
79.7% of FMCE is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMCE or IVV?
FMCE has an expense ratio of 0.71% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $68 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FMCE or IVV?
Over the past year FMCE returned +9.13% vs +17.31% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FMCE annualized +9.58% vs +16.27% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FMCE or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 11.4% for FMCE. Worst drawdown: FMCE -11.7% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both FMCE and IVV?
FMCE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FMCE and IVV?
79.7% of FMCE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 28.2% of IVV's is in holdings FMCE also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in FMCE and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMCE or IVV?
FMCE yields 2.82% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FMCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FMCE?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.