FMCE vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFMCEIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.72%0.03%
AUM$67M$865.2B
Dividend Yield2.82%1.09%
Holdings30508
YTD Return+11.09%+13.43%
1Y Return+16.00%+22.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.47%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.26%
Volatility (annualized)11.7%15.1%
Max Drawdown-11.7%-56.5%
Fund FamilyFirst ManhattaniShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 8, 2024May 15, 2000

FMCE vs IVV Performance

FM Compounders Equity ETF (FMCE) is a ETF from First Manhattan and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FMCE returned +16.00% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, FMCE is up 11.09% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.7% for FMCE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.7% for FMCE and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FMCE charges 0.72% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMCE currently yields 2.82% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

20.8%overlap

FMCE and IVV share 27 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 20.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FMCEWeight in IVVDifference
MSFT5.42%4.57%0.85%
NVDA1.11%7.76%6.65%
AMZN4.55%3.75%0.80%
INTCProProPro
BRK.BProProPro
KKRProProPro
VProProPro
GEProProPro
METAProProPro
HONProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 10 holdings FMCE shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FMCE or IVV?

FMCE has an expense ratio of 0.72% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FMCE or IVV?

Over the past year FMCE returned +16.00% vs +22.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FMCE annualized +11.10% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FMCE or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.7% for FMCE. Worst drawdown: FMCE -11.7% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both FMCE and IVV?

FMCE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FMCE and IVV?

FMCE and IVV share 27 common holdings with a 20.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FMCE or IVV?

FMCE yields 2.82% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FMCE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.