FMQQ vs IVV
The Next Frontier Internet ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMQQ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.86% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $22M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -7.28% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.71% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.74% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.51% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Exchange Traded Concepts Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
FMQQ vs IVV Performance
The Next Frontier Internet ETF (FMQQ) is a ETF from Exchange Traded Concepts Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FMQQ returned -12.71% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, FMQQ is down 7.28% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, FMQQ compounded at +6.74% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -12.51% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs -12.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.5% for FMQQ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMQQ charges 0.86% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $86 vs $3 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMQQ currently yields 0.69% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FMQQ and IVV share 0 holdings out of 543 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMQQ or IVV?
FMQQ has an expense ratio of 0.86% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FMQQ or IVV?
Over the past year FMQQ returned -12.71% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FMQQ annualized -12.51% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FMQQ or IVV?
FMQQ has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FMQQ -64.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FMQQ and IVV?
FMQQ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FMQQ and IVV?
FMQQ and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 543 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMQQ or IVV?
FMQQ yields 0.69% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.