FMQQ vs VTI
The Next Frontier Internet ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMQQ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.86% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $22M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -7.28% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -12.71% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.74% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.51% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Exchange Traded Concepts Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
FMQQ vs VTI Performance
The Next Frontier Internet ETF (FMQQ) is a ETF from Exchange Traded Concepts Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FMQQ returned -12.71% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, FMQQ is down 7.28% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, FMQQ compounded at +6.74% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -12.51% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs -12.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.5% for FMQQ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMQQ charges 0.86% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $86 vs $3 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMQQ currently yields 0.69% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FMQQ and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2825 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMQQ or VTI?
FMQQ has an expense ratio of 0.86% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FMQQ or VTI?
Over the past year FMQQ returned -12.71% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FMQQ annualized -12.51% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FMQQ or VTI?
FMQQ has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FMQQ -64.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FMQQ and VTI?
FMQQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FMQQ and VTI?
FMQQ and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2825 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMQQ or VTI?
FMQQ yields 0.69% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.