FNGG vs GTOS
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
GTOS has a lower expense ratio. FNGG delivered stronger 1-year returns. GTOS offers more diversification with 703 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | GTOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.30% | |
| AUM | $143M | $124M | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.70% | 4.52% | |
| Holdings | 18 | 703 | |
| YTD Return | +29.44% | -0.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.54% | +1.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +60.38% | +4.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.76% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.4% | 1.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.3% | -1.8% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | Dec 9, 2022 |
FNGG vs GTOS Performance
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF (FNGG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FNGG returned +35.54% while GTOS returned +1.23%. Year to date, FNGG is up 29.44% versus a loss of 0.75% for GTOS.
Over three years, FNGG compounded at +60.38% per year against +4.69% for GTOS. Across the full 4-year window we track, GTOS has the edge at +4.29% annualized vs +3.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.4% compared with 1.9% for GTOS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.3% for FNGG and -1.8% for GTOS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGG charges 0.97% per year while GTOS charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $30 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGG currently yields 10.70% against 4.52% for GTOS.
Holdings Overlap
FNGG and GTOS share 0 holdings out of 272 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGG or GTOS?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while GTOS charges 0.30%. GTOS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNGG or GTOS?
Over the past year FNGG returned +35.54% vs +1.23% for GTOS, so FNGG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FNGG annualized +3.76% vs +4.29% for GTOS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNGG or GTOS?
FNGG has been the more volatile fund at 58.4% annualized versus 1.9% for GTOS. Worst drawdown: FNGG -91.3% vs GTOS -1.8%.
Should I hold both FNGG and GTOS?
FNGG and GTOS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGG and GTOS?
FNGG and GTOS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 272 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGG or GTOS?
FNGG yields 10.70% while GTOS yields 4.52%, so FNGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.