FNGG vs IZRL
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
IZRL has a lower expense ratio. FNGG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IZRL offers more diversification with 67 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | IZRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $143M | $137M | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.70% | 2.63% | |
| Holdings | 18 | 67 | |
| YTD Return | +29.44% | -3.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.54% | +7.20% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +60.38% | +15.13% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.76% | -0.29% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.4% | 23.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.3% | -60.0% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Ark Invest | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | Dec 4, 2017 |
FNGG vs IZRL Performance
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF (FNGG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) is a ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year FNGG returned +35.54% while IZRL returned +7.20%. Year to date, FNGG is up 29.44% versus a loss of 3.33% for IZRL.
Over three years, FNGG compounded at +60.38% per year against +15.13% for IZRL; over five years the annualized figures are +3.76% and -0.29% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IZRL has the edge at +5.06% annualized vs +3.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.4% compared with 23.5% for IZRL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.3% for FNGG and -60.0% for IZRL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGG charges 0.97% per year while IZRL charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $49 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGG currently yields 10.70% against 2.63% for IZRL.
Holdings Overlap
FNGG and IZRL share 0 holdings out of 79 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGG or IZRL?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while IZRL charges 0.49%. IZRL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNGG or IZRL?
Over the past year FNGG returned +35.54% vs +7.20% for IZRL, so FNGG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FNGG annualized +3.76% vs +5.06% for IZRL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNGG or IZRL?
FNGG has been the more volatile fund at 58.4% annualized versus 23.5% for IZRL. Worst drawdown: FNGG -91.3% vs IZRL -60.0%.
Should I hold both FNGG and IZRL?
FNGG and IZRL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGG and IZRL?
FNGG and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 79 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGG or IZRL?
FNGG yields 10.70% while IZRL yields 2.63%, so FNGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.