FNGO vs VXUS
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FNGO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGO | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $772M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +28.17% | +13.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.38% | +24.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +59.95% | +20.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +28.13% | +9.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 56.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | BMO Capital Markets | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2018 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FNGO vs VXUS Performance
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) is a ETF from BMO Capital Markets and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGO returned +25.38% while VXUS returned +24.30%. Year to date, FNGO is up 28.17% versus a gain of 13.56% for VXUS.
Over three years, FNGO compounded at +59.95% per year against +20.24% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +28.13% and +9.37% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, FNGO has the edge at +38.95% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 56.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.4% for FNGO and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGO charges 0.95% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $5 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGO currently yields 0.00% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FNGO and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7879 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGO or VXUS?
FNGO has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNGO or VXUS?
Over the past year FNGO returned +25.38% vs +24.30% for VXUS, so FNGO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FNGO annualized +38.95% vs +4.79% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNGO or VXUS?
FNGO has been the more volatile fund at 56.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FNGO -78.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FNGO and VXUS?
FNGO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGO and VXUS?
FNGO and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7879 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGO or VXUS?
FNGO yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.