FNGO vs VXUS
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, FNGO or VXUS?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FNGO led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VXUS over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGO | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $769M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 10 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +32.41%Best | +14.83% |
| 1Y Return | +22.80% | +24.27%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +56.14%Best | +19.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +25.30%Best | +9.07% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 56.0% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -78.4% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $30,886Best | $15,436 |
| Fund Family | BMO Capital Markets | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2018 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 2, 2018 to Sep 9, 2026 (8.1 years).
FNGO vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FNGO vs VXUS Performance
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) is an ETF from BMO Capital Markets and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGO returned +22.80% while VXUS returned +24.27%. Year to date, FNGO is up 32.41% versus a gain of 14.83% for VXUS.
Over three years, FNGO compounded at +56.14% per year against +19.98% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +25.30% and +9.07% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, FNGO has the edge at +39.17% annualized vs +8.13%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 56.0% compared with 16.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.4% for FNGO and -35.1% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGO charges 0.95% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $5 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGO currently yields 0.00% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 10 holdings in FNGO and 8,091 in VXUS, totalling 100.0% and 87.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, FNGO as of Aug 18, 2026 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGO and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 10 and 8,747.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FNGO and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGO or VXUS?
FNGO has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $90 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FNGO or VXUS?
Over the past year FNGO returned +22.80% vs +24.27% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FNGO annualized +39.17% vs +8.13% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FNGO or VXUS?
FNGO has been the more volatile fund at 56.0% annualized versus 16.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FNGO -78.4% vs VXUS -35.1%.
Should I hold both FNGO and VXUS?
FNGO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGO or VXUS?
FNGO yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than FNGO?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FNGO led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VXUS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.