FNGO vs VTI
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FNGO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $772M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +29.95% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.07% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +60.84% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +27.06% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 56.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | BMO Capital Markets | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
FNGO vs VTI Performance
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) is a ETF from BMO Capital Markets and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGO returned +36.07% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, FNGO is up 29.95% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, FNGO compounded at +60.84% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +27.06% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, FNGO has the edge at +39.14% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 56.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.4% for FNGO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGO charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGO currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FNGO and VTI share 10 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 28.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGO or VTI?
FNGO has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNGO or VTI?
Over the past year FNGO returned +36.07% vs +22.35% for VTI, so FNGO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FNGO annualized +39.14% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNGO or VTI?
FNGO has been the more volatile fund at 56.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FNGO -78.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FNGO and VTI?
FNGO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGO and VTI?
FNGO and VTI share 10 common holdings with a 28.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGO or VTI?
FNGO yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.