FNGO vs VYM
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FNGO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGO | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $772M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +29.43% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.55% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +60.40% | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +28.80% | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 56.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | BMO Capital Markets | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FNGO vs VYM Performance
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) is a ETF from BMO Capital Markets and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGO returned +31.55% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, FNGO is up 29.43% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Over three years, FNGO compounded at +60.40% per year against +19.07% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +28.80% and +12.50% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, FNGO has the edge at +39.10% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 56.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.4% for FNGO and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGO charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGO currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FNGO and VYM share 1 holdings out of 612 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FNGO | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | 10.08% | 7.29% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGO or VYM?
FNGO has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNGO or VYM?
Over the past year FNGO returned +31.55% vs +23.48% for VYM, so FNGO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FNGO annualized +39.10% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNGO or VYM?
FNGO has been the more volatile fund at 56.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FNGO -78.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FNGO and VYM?
FNGO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGO and VYM?
FNGO and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 7.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 612 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGO or VYM?
FNGO yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.