FNGO vs VYM
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FNGO or VYM?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FNGO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $769M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 10 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +32.41%Best | +13.75% |
| 1Y Return | +22.80%Best | +19.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +56.14%Best | +18.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +25.30%Best | +12.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 56.0% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -78.4% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $30,886Best | $17,758 |
| Top 10 Weight | 100.0% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | BMO Capital Markets | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 2, 2018 to Sep 9, 2026 (8.1 years).
FNGO vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FNGO vs VYM Performance
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) is an ETF from BMO Capital Markets and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGO returned +22.80% while VYM returned +19.42%. Year to date, FNGO is up 32.41% versus a gain of 13.75% for VYM.
Over three years, FNGO compounded at +56.14% per year against +18.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +25.30% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, FNGO has the edge at +39.17% annualized vs +10.33%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 56.0% compared with 15.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.4% for FNGO and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGO charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGO currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
9.3% of FNGO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.3% of VYM's money is in holdings FNGO also owns.
FNGO and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, FNGO as of Aug 18, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGO and 603 in VYM, against full books of 10 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 567 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FNGO (90.2% of the fund), and 9 for FNGO that do not appear in VYM (90.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FNGO | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 9.31% | 7.29% | 2.02% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FNGO and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGO or VYM?
FNGO has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $91 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FNGO or VYM?
Over the past year FNGO returned +22.80% vs +19.42% for VYM, so FNGO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), FNGO annualized +39.17% vs +10.33% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FNGO or VYM?
FNGO has been the more volatile fund at 56.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FNGO -78.4% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both FNGO and VYM?
FNGO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGO and VYM?
9.3% of FNGO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.3% of VYM's is in holdings FNGO also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGO and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGO or VYM?
FNGO yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FNGO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FNGO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.