FOWF vs SCHD
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, FOWF or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FOWF led over the full window, SCHD over 1Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FOWF | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $16M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 98 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +8.33% | +21.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.48% | +25.15%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.32% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9%Best | 13.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.3%Best | -14.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $14,316Best | $12,975 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.8% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Sep 24, 2026 (1.8 years).
FOWF vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
FOWF vs SCHD Performance
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FOWF returned +11.48% while SCHD returned +25.15%. Year to date, FOWF is up 8.33% versus a gain of 21.33% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.7% compared with 12.9% for FOWF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.3% for FOWF and -14.0% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FOWF charges 0.49% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $6 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FOWF currently yields 0.73% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
7.9% of FOWF's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 6.8% of SCHD's money is in holdings FOWF also owns.
FOWF and SCHD share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in FOWF and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 98 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 97 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for FOWF (93.2% of the fund), and 59 for FOWF that do not appear in SCHD (72.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FOWF and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FOWF or SCHD?
FOWF has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FOWF or SCHD?
Over the past year FOWF returned +11.48% vs +25.15% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FOWF annualized +22.06% vs +15.57% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FOWF or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.7% annualized versus 12.9% for FOWF. Worst drawdown: FOWF -12.3% vs SCHD -14.0%.
Should I hold both FOWF and SCHD?
FOWF and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FOWF and SCHD?
7.9% of FOWF's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 6.8% of SCHD's is in holdings FOWF also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in FOWF and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, FOWF or SCHD?
FOWF yields 0.73% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than FOWF?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FOWF led over the full window, SCHD over 1Y. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.