FOWF vs VXUS
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FOWF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $19M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 98 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +18.62% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.59% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FOWF vs VXUS Performance
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FOWF returned +25.59% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, FOWF is up 18.62% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.8% for FOWF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.3% for FOWF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FOWF charges 0.49% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $5 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FOWF currently yields 0.73% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FOWF and VXUS share 19 holdings out of 7943 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FOWF or VXUS?
FOWF has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FOWF or VXUS?
Over the past year FOWF returned +25.59% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FOWF annualized +30.70% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FOWF or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.8% for FOWF. Worst drawdown: FOWF -12.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FOWF and VXUS?
FOWF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FOWF and VXUS?
FOWF and VXUS share 19 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7943 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FOWF or VXUS?
FOWF yields 0.73% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.