FOWF vs VYM
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FOWF or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FOWF led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FOWF | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $16M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 98 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +8.33% | +9.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.48% | +13.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.45% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 10.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.3%Best | -14.5% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $14,316Best | $12,977 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.8% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Sep 24, 2026 (1.8 years).
FOWF vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
FOWF vs VYM Performance
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FOWF returned +11.48% while VYM returned +13.77%. Year to date, FOWF is up 8.33% versus a gain of 9.71% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FOWF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 10.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.3% for FOWF and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FOWF charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FOWF currently yields 0.73% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
36.8% of FOWF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.9% of VYM's money is in holdings FOWF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
22 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in FOWF and 557 in VYM, against full books of 98 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 506 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FOWF (87.2% of the fund), and 39 for FOWF that do not appear in VYM (43.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FOWF | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 7.14% | 0.48% | 6.66% |
| GDGeneral Dynamics Corp. | 7.12% | 0.40% | 6.72% |
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp. | 7.04% | 0.29% | 6.75% |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 3.44% | 0.21% | 3.23% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.64% | 1.86% | 1.22% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 0.77% | 0.90% | 0.13% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 0.70% | 0.85% | 0.15% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.72% | 0.80% | 0.08% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 0.74% | 0.64% | 0.10% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 0.75% | 0.50% | 0.25% |
36.8% of FOWF is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FOWF or VYM?
FOWF has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FOWF or VYM?
Over the past year FOWF returned +11.48% vs +13.77% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FOWF annualized +22.06% vs +15.58% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FOWF or VYM?
FOWF has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 10.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FOWF -12.3% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both FOWF and VYM?
FOWF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FOWF and VYM?
36.8% of FOWF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.9% of VYM's is in holdings FOWF also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in FOWF and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FOWF or VYM?
FOWF yields 0.73% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FOWF?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FOWF led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.